Yesterday I posted on the HP Class Action Lawsuit Settlement. Today I would like to provide my thoughts on the topic. Take them for what they are worth, but definitely let me know how you feel.

Suit #1 – The ‘Low Ink Message’ confused customers in to purchasing cartridges when they didn’t have to. Huh? To me this is a large reach. Since when does the term ‘low on ink’ mean the same thing as ‘out of ink’. Low in ink means just that, your cartridge is running low on ink and it will run out soon. How soon? No one knows for sure, but your best bet would be to make sure you get some spare cartridges on hand for the day it does run out. So yes, HP is guilty of promoting the purchase new cartridges, but confusing you in to throwing away cartridges before you had to. No way! I’ve been in the printer cartridge business for over 10 years and the vast majority of customers I have spoken to work hard to get every last drop of ink out of their cartridge before replacing it. The vast majority also have no faith in the low ink warning. Perhaps this is just a way for those that are unhappy with the price of printer cartridges to get a little revenge.

Suit #2 – Certain HP printers used color cartridges, along with black cartridges, when printing black text and graphics. Definitely possible! Logic says that if I am printing something that is black and white I should only be using the black ink cartridge. Because of the amount of proprietary information within HP printers and cartridges, we have not way of knowing, for sure, if HP was indeed programming their printers and cartridges to use color and black. It’s their word against those of their accusers. All I can do is hope HP is an honest company on this one.

Suit #3 – HP printers and cartridges are programmed to stop working on an HP selected expiration date. Definitely possible! This is one I have heard before. Many HP cartridges come with expiration dates stamped on their boxes. It has been shown that these dates are also programmed in to some of their cartridges. When this date hits, the cartridge stops working. HP’s reason is that ink quality begins to degrade after this date and they are preventing potential problems with your print outs. Sounds logical, but what about those folks that are willing to take the risk of a bad print because they still have ink in their cartridge. Shouldn’t they have the final say? They spent the money to buy the cartridge, right?

Here’s the real kicker though. These suits were brought by lawyers who were representing a group of clients, and are supposed to do the right thing by those clients. Does the settlement agreement really represent this? These cases won’t go to court becasue they have been settled to avoid potential risk and expense on both sides. Is HP just protecting itself from having to fess up to some of their actions?

Why did the lawyers for those of us that own HP printers decide to take the settlement. This is the most interesting thing to me. Customers with printers that meet certain criteria will be reimbursed with e-credits to HP’s online store. That’s right, HP is giving you credit to buy more of the same cartridges and printers you are already unhappy with. Does this strike anyone else as strange?

Who is in the right here? Who is in the wrong? I guess the true measure will be the consumers level of satisfaction with their e-credits.

What’s your reaction to this? Let me know what you think. Thanks!